At first glance, robots and proteins have little in common. Robots are commonly thought of as tools that perform tasks such as vacuuming the floor, while proteins play essential roles in many biochemical processes. However, the functionality of both robots and proteins is highly dependent on their motions. In order to study motions in these two divergent domains, the same underlying algorithmic framework can be applied. This method is derived from probabilistic roadmap methods (PRMs) originally developed for robotic motion planning. It builds a graph, or roadmap, where configurations are represented as vertices and transitions between configurations are edges. The contribution of this work is a set of intelligent methods applied to PRMs. These methods facilitate both the modeling and analysis of motions, and have enabled the study of complex and high-dimensional problems in both robotic and molecular domains. In order to efficiently study biologically relevant molecular folding behaviors we have developed new techniques based on Monte Carlo solution, master equation calculation, and non-linear dimensionality reduction to run simulations and analysis on the roadmap. The first method, Map-based master equation calculation (MME), extracts global properties of the folding landscape such as global folding rates. On the other hand, another method, Map-based Monte Carlo solution (MMC), can be used to extract microscopic features of the folding process. Also, the application of dimensionality reduction returns a lower-dimensional representation that still retains the principal features while facilitating both modeling and analysis of motion landscapes. A key contribution of our methods is the flexibility to study larger and more complex structures, e.g., 372 residue Alpha-1 antitrypsin and 200 nucleotide ColE1 RNAII. We also applied intelligent roadmap-based techniques to the area of robotic motion. These methods take advantage of unsupervised learning methods at all stages of the planning process and produces solutions in complex spaces with little cost and less manual intervention compared to other adaptive methods. Our results show that our methods have low overhead and that they out-perform two existing adaptive methods in all complex cases studied.